It has now been a little over two weeks since my return to the US, and I think it was just yesterday that I succeeded in getting the rest of the dirt from underneath my fingernails. As predicted, my manicurist was less than thrilled with the condition of my nail beds. And, as so many of you have pointed out in disbelief, yes, I am tan. This is a first for me, so, mark it on the calendar.
In order to wrap up my blog about my Grecian adventures, I thought it would be appropriate to gather the little ironies of archaeology and compile them into a list for your enjoyment and bewilderment. Included are several ‘definitions’ of archaeology that I heard tossed about by professors and trench workers alike and stored away for such a time as this.
Archaeology is…
1. “Sweeping dirt off of dirt.”Following is an actual conversation I had Week 5: “Hey! How was your day?” “Oh, you know. Not bad. Swept some dirt off of dirt”. Watching someone sweep their trench with a broom is rather comical, as it feels instinctively contradictory. Several times, the paradox elicited a dead pan, “you missed a spot.” But you learn quickly that some dirt is more important than other dirt. Archaeologists treat dirt like Carrie Bradshaw treats her shoe collection. One day you ooh and awe over it but the next? Out of style and in the way of more important prospects. Once a pass is finished and all the ancient paraphernalia has been removed, the empty dirt is obsolete and very annoyingly in the way of beginning another pass. So, it is swept away, waiting for the day it becomes backfill material.
2. Unfair. Trench masters sit and watch their workers slave away, as they lounge beneath the shade of a tree, fanning themselves and commenting on the severity of the heat. This tends to earn them glares and grumbles from their pack mules, ahem, trench workers. Despite this disparity in work load, trench masters receive all the credit for what is found in their trench, creating a hierarchy not unlike the big fish that eats the littler fish, who eats the tiny sardine. To be fair, everyone pays their dues. Trench masters were at one time trench workers, and have earned their positions by a lot of hard work. But what else do trench workers have time to do during the long days but gripe fondly about their fearless leaders?
3. Interpretive. Trench masters have a habit of congregating above your trench to muse philosophically about the meaning of such and such rock formation, debate the mysteries of soil color inconsistencies, and hypothesize about the surprising scarcity of stone tools, smoking cigarette after cigarette. Notes are scratched into plastic, yellow notebooks and are later included in research to be published years from now after being defended in front of an intimidating board of seasoned archaeologists. But in reality, no one can tell you that you are wrong in your research, because it is left up to your reasonable interpretation. We can’t know for sure if that particular room was a house or a store room, or if that pile of rocks is a wall that fell over or simply, an ancient pile of rocks. Archaeology is not an exact science, and hence, vulnerable to human limitations and mistakes.
4. “Strategically removing rocks”, according to one professor. “Um, I’m not sure that’s a wall. But if we move this rock, it sure does look like one!” said with hopeful eyes begging for me to agree with them. It’s intimidating to think that one wrong move, removing a rock that actually belongs right where it’s at, and your mistaken interpretation could become the published authority for students worldwide. This wide margin of error is why archaeologists are criticized for constructing models of what they think a site used to look like, such as Knossos, where visitors are impressed by reconstructions of formidable temple walls that might not bear a bit of resemblance to what it did thousands of years ago. This is kept in mind when choosing what rocks to remove and which ones to leave standing at Gournia, so that we leave the most accurate portrayal of the ancient village as possible.
5. An intense environment. There is a lot of pressure to perform, to find as much significant material as possible, because of time constraints and the ever-looming funding issue. Donors to archaeological projects want to see results, and so when a trench doesn’t produce anything noteworthy within several days, all you start hearing is “Work harder. Move more dirt. Work faster.”, so we can move onto another area with more promise. There are very few, if any, laid back days, and the minute one project is finished, you are looking forward to the next.
So there you have it. Archaeology in a nutshell. Tiring and stressful but hugely gratifying, spending six weeks in Greece was a decision that has enriched my academic and personal life. I have a new appreciation as a historian for the effort and time put into finding artifacts that I admire in museums, and it taught me the importance of academic professionals collaborating on research, as people with different areas of expertise bring a richness of perspective to our understand of culture as a whole. The Greek passion for life and the creativity they have embodied for thousands of years is one that has inspired me to pursue my own myriad of creative interests with refreshed zeal and purpose. I hope my adventures and misadventures have brought you laughter this summer, as I enjoy finding humor in life’s daily monotonies and its extraordinary moments as well.
Yammas!